Methodological issues in diarrhoeal diseases epidemiology: definition of diarrhoeal episodes

Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBaqui, Abdullah H.-
dc.contributor.authorBlack, Robert E.-
dc.contributor.authorYunus, Md.-
dc.contributor.authorHoque, AR Azimul-
dc.contributor.authorChowdhury, HR.-
dc.contributor.authorSack, R Bradley-
dc.date.accessioned2013-03-19T08:47:54Z-
dc.date.available2013-03-19T08:47:54Z-
dc.date.issued1991-12-
dc.identifier.citationInt J Epidemiol 1991 Dec;20(4):1057-63en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/4373-
dc.description.abstractA review of the diarrhoeal disease literature reveals considerable variability in the definition of diarrhoeal episodes. The use of various definitions of diarrhoea and episodes leads to misclassification, affects the estimates of the disease burden in communities and reduces comparability of the findings from different studies. This study is an attempt to validate the definition of diarrhoeal episodes using prospectively collected community-based surveillance data. In comparative validation analyses, three or more loose stools or any number of loose stools containing blood in a 24-hour period seemed to be the best definition of diarrhoea. Three intervening diarrhoea-free days seemed to be the optimum to define a new episode. The implications of using differing definitions and the importance of using a validated definition are discussed.en
dc.format.extent381271 bytes-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subjectChild, Preschoolen
dc.subjectRural healthen
dc.subjectRisk factorsen
dc.subjectLongitudinal studiesen
dc.subjectProspective studiesen
dc.subjectInfanten
dc.subjectEpidemiologyen
dc.subjectShigellosisen
dc.titleMethodological issues in diarrhoeal diseases epidemiology: definition of diarrhoeal episodesen
dc.typeArticleen
Appears in Collections:Information sciences conference papers
A. Original papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
1991-IntJEpidemiol-1057-BaquiAH.pdf372.33 kBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy


This item is protected by original copyright