Evaluation of indigenous plants in the treatment of acute shigellosis

Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHaider, R-
dc.contributor.authorKhan, AKA-
dc.contributor.authorAziz, KMS-
dc.contributor.authorChowdhury, A-
dc.contributor.authorKabir, I-
dc.date.accessioned2013-02-27T03:11:51Z-
dc.date.available2013-02-27T03:11:51Z-
dc.date.issued1991-07-
dc.identifier.citationTrop Geogr Med 1991 Jul;43(3):266-70en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/4366-
dc.description.abstractThe clinical efficacy of three indigenous plants was compared with that of ampicillin and placebo in a randomized double blind clinical trial. Eighty-two men with shigellosis were studied. Sixteen patients received dried unripe fruit powder of 'bel' (Aegle marmelos), 19 received dried powdered plant of 'thankuni' (Hydrocotyle asiatica), 15 received a similar preparation of 'gandhavadulia' (Paederia foetida), 15 received ampicillin and 17 received a placebo. Treatment with indigenous plants did not show any clinical improvement or bacteriological cure as compared to ampicillin. The natural history of shigellosis was obtained by documenting the response of the indigenous plants and placebo treated groups.en
dc.format.extent186147 bytes-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subjectAdolescenten
dc.subjectAdulten
dc.subjectAgeden
dc.subjectDysenteryen
dc.subjectMedicine, Ayurvedicen
dc.subjectEvaluation studiesen
dc.subjectDiarrhea, Acuteen
dc.titleEvaluation of indigenous plants in the treatment of acute shigellosisen
dc.typeArticleen
Appears in Collections:A. Original papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
1991-TropGeogrMed-266-HaiderK.pdf181.78 kBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy


This item is protected by original copyright