Rice-powder electrolyte solution as oral-therapy in diarrhoea due to Vibrio cholerae and Escherichia coli

Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMolla, A.M.-
dc.contributor.authorSarker, S.A.-
dc.contributor.authorHossain, M.-
dc.contributor.authorMolla, A.-
dc.contributor.authorGreenough, William B III-
dc.date.accessioned2011-01-17T09:20:51Z-
dc.date.available2011-01-17T09:20:51Z-
dc.date.issued1982-06-
dc.identifier.citationLancet 1982 Jun 12;1(8285):1317-9en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/2809-
dc.description.abstract124 patients with acute diarrhoea due to Vibrio cholerae or Escherichia coli were treated with either the standard sucrose-electrolyte solution or a cereal-based electrolyte solution, containing 30 g rice powder per litre and electrolytes as recommended by the World Health Organisation. The treatments were compared by measuring the rate of purging, change in body weight, serum specific gravity, urine output, and post-hydrolysis sugar content in the stool. The proportions of successfully treated patients in the rice-powder group were 80% for cholera patients and 88% for E. coli patients--no different from those in patients receiving the sucrose-electrolyte solution. Failure was due to rates of purging that exceeded the patient's ability to drink enough replacement solution. This study suggests that a rice-powder electrolyte solution is efficient and safe to use as a rehydrating oral fluid in acute diarrhoeaen
dc.format.extent804211 bytes-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subjectDiarrhea - therapyen
dc.subjectDiarrhea-etiologyen
dc.subjectElectrolytes-administration & dosageen
dc.subjectOral therapyen
dc.subjectEscherichia colien
dc.subjectShigellaen
dc.subjectVibrio choleraeen
dc.titleRice-powder electrolyte solution as oral-therapy in diarrhoea due to Vibrio cholerae and Escherichia colien
dc.typeArticleen
Appears in Collections:A. Original papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
1982-Lancet-1317-MollaAM.pdf785.36 kBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy


This item is protected by original copyright