Comparison of PCR method with the culture method for identification of gonococci from endocervical swabs

Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAlam, Md. A.-
dc.contributor.authorMiah, Md. R. A.-
dc.contributor.authorRahman, M.-
dc.contributor.authorSattar, H.-
dc.contributor.authorSaleh, A.A.-
dc.date.accessioned2009-10-14T08:16:40Z-
dc.date.available2002-
dc.date.issued2002-01-
dc.identifier.citationIndian J Med Microbiol 2002 Jan-Mar;20(1):37-9en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/2513-
dc.description.abstractGonococcal infection remains still a major cause of morbidity among sexually active individuals. Diagnosis of the infection in a female case is more difficult than that in a male. This was a prospective study among 269 female commercial sex workers (CSWs) to screen them for gonococcal infection, comparing the rapid method of identification of gonococci by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) with the selective culture method. A total of 92 (34.2%) CSWs were identified positive for Neisseria gonorrhoeae by combination of the two methods. The PCR method identified 87 of the specimens to harbour cppB gene of N. gonorrhoeae, whereas culture method identified 83 specimens showing colonies of gonococci. Taking into consideration of the total positive cases (92), the PCR method showed a sensitivity of 94.57%, whereas sensitivity of culture method was 90.22%. The selective culture method appears to be the most applicable in the identification of gonococci from clinical specimens, particularly in the less resourceful countries like Bangladeshen
dc.format.extent116092 bytes-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subjectBangladeshen
dc.subjectNeisseria gonorrhoeaeen
dc.subjectPolymerase chain reactionen
dc.subjectProspective studiesen
dc.subjectProstitutionen
dc.titleComparison of PCR method with the culture method for identification of gonococci from endocervical swabsen
dc.typeArticleen
Appears in Collections:A. Original papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
2002-IndianJMedMicrobiol-37-AlamMA.pdf113.37 kBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy


This item is protected by original copyright