Rapid detection of rotavirus in faces by a side latex agglutination test as compared with an enzyme- linked immunosorbent assay

Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGrahnquist, L.-
dc.contributor.authorStintzing, G.-
dc.contributor.authorAlam, A.N.-
dc.contributor.authorSvensson, L.-
dc.date.accessioned2007-10-30T01:58:07Z-
dc.date.available2007-10-30T01:58:07Z-
dc.date.issued1987-
dc.identifier.citationJ Diarrhoeal Dis Res 1987 Sep;5(3):178-180-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/238-
dc.description.abstractA commercial latex agglutination slide test for rotavirus detection (RotascreenR) was compared with an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) in a hospital setting using 225 patients, 6-24 months of age, who came with clinical symptoms suggestive of rotavirus diarrhoea. Of 225 specimens 120 (53% ) were found positive with the ELISA compared with only 69 (31%) using the Rotascreen. Twelve specimens gave equivocal results with Rotascreen, 2 of which were positive and the remaining 10 were negative using the EUSA. Excluding the results of these 12 specimens by both the assays, the Rotascreen showed a specificity of 95% and sensitivity of 54%, in comparison with results in the EUSA. Rotascreen is a rapid and simple test with a satisfactory specificity but a low sensitivity.en
dc.format.extent121868 bytes-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subjectRotavirusesen
dc.subjectDiarrhoeaen
dc.subjectInfantileen
dc.subjectDiarrhoea, Acuteen
dc.subjectEnzyme-linked immunosorbent assayen
dc.subjectDiagnosis, Laboratoryen
dc.subjectLatex fixation testsen
dc.titleRapid detection of rotavirus in faces by a side latex agglutination test as compared with an enzyme- linked immunosorbent assayen
dc.typeArticleen
Appears in Collections:Public health sciences research papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
1987-JDiarDisRes-178-GrahnquistL.pdf119.01 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright